Every candidate ID-verified. Every skill proven on video. Know who you're hiring before the interview, not after the first shift.
Self-authored: the applicant grades their own homework. Summary: lossy by design, it tells you someone managed a kitchen, not whether they can plate under fire. Claims: assertions, not evidence. The resume made sense when work history was unverifiable any other way. That constraint is gone.
Almost every business owner has hired someone who did not perform the way the resume or the interview promised. Most have done it more than once. The training weeks, the re-interviewing, the empty seat: one bad hire costs far more than the salary.
The talented cook who cannot write. The skilled tech with a two-line work history. The perfect hire whose resume had one typo and never got a call. Resumes filter on writing ability for jobs that are not writing jobs, and your best applicant pays the price.
Post one job and hundreds of replies arrive, most of them AI-generated, perfectly formatted, written in seconds. So employers buy AI tools to filter the AI resumes. Somewhere in that loop, the actual human being disappeared. Hiring without resumes puts the person back in view.
Identity first. Every candidate is ID-verified, so ghost applicants and interview fraud end at the door.
Skills on video. Twenty seconds of someone actually cutting hair, plating a dish, or running conduit outranks a page of bullets.
Evidence before the interview. Meet fewer candidates, better ones, and let interviews confirm instead of discover.
